Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 2012, two hand weeding increased rice panicles per m2 and grain yield by 83.6% compared with zero weeding.

A claim from Determination of Weed Control Efficiency of Pre-Rice Cropping Cassava/Legume Intercrops and Different Weed Management Practices in Low Land Rice at Badeggi Central Nigeria · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, two hand weeding increased rice panicles per m2 and grain yield by 83.6% compared with zero weeding.

Treatment
two hand weedinge4
Outcome
Rice panicles per m2 and rice grain yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
83.6%e4
Comparator
zero weedinge4
Setting
2012e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice planted after cassava/Mucuna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2137–2170
e4

“Rice panicles per m2 and rice grain yield were increased by 72.9%, 83.6% and 84.1% in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, with two hand weeding when compared with zero weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2703–2877

Title

Determination of Weed Control Efficiency of Pre-Rice Cropping Cassava/Legume Intercrops and Different Weed Management Practices in Low Land Rice at Badeggi Central Nigeria

I. Umaru; A. U Gbanguba; M Bashir; et al. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies 2023. doi:10.37745/bjmas.2022.0256

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-9987ee020f2e141e38327ecbc80c1ab3e1ece7fd31ff1925e2f9a9ce9a708438 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this claim · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

793 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.