Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Metolachlor plus atrazine with supplementary hoe weeding gave higher economic returns.

A claim from Evaluation of herbicide mixtures and manual weed control methods in maize ( Zea mays L.) production in the southern guinea agro-ecology of Nigeria · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor plus atrazine with supplementary hoe weeding gave higher economic returns.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
metolachlor + atrazinee0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metolachlor + atrazine and pendimethalin + atrazine at 1.0 + 2.0 kg a.i./ha plus one SHW at 6 WAS significantly reduced weed infestation and gave higher maize grain yield and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1077

Title

Evaluation of herbicide mixtures and manual weed control methods in maize ( Zea mays L.) production in the southern guinea agro-ecology of Nigeria

Emmanuel Oyamedan Imoloame Journal of Tropical Agriculture 2017

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-99f9b2d808cf5cefe910cf42e5a7020b4cc98d6fade3cd84e2a5d533a451c2ff · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

metolachlor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.