Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nutrient management did not significantly affect plant height or cane length.

A claim from Studies on optimum plant geometry and nutrient management strategy on biomass and economics of sugarcane (Saccharum species Hybrid) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient management did not significantly affect plant height or cane length.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
nutrient managemente4
Outcome
plant height and cane lengthe7
Direction
non significante7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–104
e4

“Effect of nutrient management on gross return, net return, B: C ratio (1.44) and cane productivity (100.72 t/ha) were calculated significantly higher in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizers (Azotobacter + P.S.B. @ 10 kg/ha treated plots (F 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1944
e7

“effects on plant height and cane length were non significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1949–2009

Title

Studies on optimum plant geometry and nutrient management strategy on biomass and economics of sugarcane (Saccharum species Hybrid)

Satendra Kumar; S.P. Yadav; Y.P. Bharti; et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2018. doi:10.15740/has/ijas/14.2/313-317

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-9a76a53a2f4e197779579e6eba68e93947f5dd5c6ce1ed1be62592f919518cf0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

138 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.