Cane productivity was significantly higher under 100% recommended fertilizer plus 25% N as organic manure with biofertilizers than under the other nutrient practice.

inorganic molecular entity · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

1. positive
   Combined inorganic, organic and biofertilizer application gave significantly higher cane yield (123.43 t/ha).

   Studies on plant geometry and nutrient management strategy in relation to mechanization in sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid) · 2016

   Same directionCited by this paper

2. positive
   Integrated nutrient management increased plant cane yield by 27.7 per cent versus inorganic NPK alone.

   Impact of INM Strategies on Growth, Yield, Quality and Profitability as well as Soil Fertility Status in Sugarcane · 2012 · compared with 100% NPK alone through inorganic fertilizers

   Same direction

inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

1. no effect
   Neither inoculum changed shoot and root dry matter accumulation.

   Endophytic bacteria affect sugarcane physiology without changing plant growth · 2015 · compared with control condition

   Opposite direction

2. negative
   Experimental G. diazotrophicus inoculation reduced sugarcane glycoprotein production.

   Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, a sugarcane endophyte, inhibits xanthan production by sugarcane-invadingXanthomonas albilineans · 2010

   Opposite direction

3. no effect
   The interaction of NPK and biofertilizer doses had an insignificant effect on number of leaves, stem diameter and number of tillers of sugarcane seedlings.

   The Effect Of NPK Fertilizer Doses And Biofertilizers On The Growth Of Sugar Cane Chips Bud (Saccharum Officinarum L.) Seedlings · 2025

   Opposite direction

4. positive
   Inoculation with B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at 135 kg ha-1 P2O5 gave the maximum stalk yield of sugarcane.

   Inoculation With Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated With the Reduction of Phosphate Fertilization in Sugarcane · 2020

   Same direction

5. positive
   Bacterial inoculation increased RB72454 stalk yield similarly to nitrogen fertilization in plant-cane and first ratoon harvests.

   Inoculation of sugarcane with diazotrophic bacteria · 2014 · compared with fertilization with 120 kg ha-1 N

   Same direction

6. positive
   Inoculation increased stem yield of RB867515 at Sapucaia by 22.3 Mg ha−1 compared with the control.

   Yield of sugarcane varieties and their sugar quality grown in different soil types and inoculated with a diazotrophic bacteria consortium · 2017 · compared with control

   Same direction

7. positive
   Bio-fertilizer increased sugarcane yield by 3-12% versus compound fertilizer.

   Bio-fertilizer Affects Structural Dynamics, Function, and Network Patterns of the Sugarcane Rhizospheric Microbiota · 2021 · compared with CF treatment group

   Same direction

8. positive
   H15 inoculation increased cane yield by 40% over control.

   PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING BACTERIAL ENDOPHYTES FROM SUGARCANE AND THEIR POTENTIAL IN PROMOTING GROWTH OF THE HOST UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS · 2012 · compared with control

   Same direction

41 papers more in this group

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

311 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

1. positive
   Combined inorganic, organic and biofertilizer application gave significantly higher cane yield (123.43 t/ha).

   Studies on plant geometry and nutrient management strategy in relation to mechanization in sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid) · 2016

   Same directionCited by this paper

2. no effect
   Fertilization did not increase yields when mill mud was added to plant cane.

   Sugarcane Response to Mill Mud, Fertilizer, and Soybean Nutrient Sources on a Sandy Soil · 2008

   Opposite direction

3. negative
   Excess nitrogen lowered sugarcane yield.

   Different Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications Alter the Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Sugarcane · 2021

   Opposite direction

4. no effect
   Subsoil and within-row compost did not affect cane or sugar yield versus control.

   Gypsum and Compost Effects on Sugarcane Root Growth, Yield, and Plant Nutrients · 2002 · compared with the control

   Opposite direction

5. no effect
   Magnesium fertilization did not affect yield at the reported soil magnesium level.

   Water and Nitrogen Management of Sugarcane Grown on Sandy, High‐Water‐Table Soil · 1998

   Opposite direction

6. no effect
   Nitrogen fertilization did not increase sugarcane agricultural productivity.

   Productivity and technological quality of sugarcane under fertilization of nitrogen and molybdenum · 2018

   Opposite direction

7. no effect
   Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase productivity at Morrinhos-GO.

   Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant · 2020

   Opposite direction

8. negative
   Zero nitrogen in the first fertilization would substantially reduce sugarcane yield in all seasons.

   Nitrogen Leaching and Nitrogen Balance under Differing Nitrogen Fertilization for Sugarcane Cultivation on a Subtropical Island · 2021

   Opposite direction

337 papers more in this group