Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Vermicomposting leachate as liquid fertilizer for the cultivation of sugarcane (Saccharumsp.)

Federico Antonio Gutiérrez-Miceli; Roberto Carlos García-Gómez; María Angela Oliva-Llaven; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In vermicomposting, the main product is the worm casts, but a leachate is generated that contains large amounts of plant nutrients. This leachate is normally diluted to avoid plant damage. We investigated how dilution of vermicompost leachate combined with different concentrations of nitrogen (N) - phosphorus (P) - potassium (K) triple 17 fertilizer, and polyoxyethylene tridecyl alcohol as dispersant and polyethylene nonylphenol as adherent to increase efficiency of fertilizer uptake, affected sugarcane plant development. The vermicomposting leachate with pH 7.8 and electrolytic conductivity 2.6 dS m−1, contained 834 mg potassium (K) l−1, 247 mg nitrate (NO3−) l−1 and 168 mg phosphate (PO43−) l−1, was free of pathogens and resulted in a 65% germination index. Vermicompost leachate did not inhibit sugarcane growth and mixed with 170 g l−1 NPK triple 17 fertilizer resulted in the best plant development. No dispersant or adherent was required to improve plant height and stem development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost leachate had a 65% germination index.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
germination indexe1
Value
65%e1

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane plant development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–526 · show in text ↑
e1

“resulted in a 65% germination index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost leachate did not inhibit sugarcane growth.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Vermicompost leachatee0
Outcome
sugarcane growthe0
Direction
did not inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost leachate did not inhibit sugarcane growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leachate mixed with 170 g l−1 NPK triple 17 fertilizer produced the best sugarcane development.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
mixed with 170 g l−1 NPK triple 17 fertilizere1
Outcome
plant developmente1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane plant development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–526 · show in text ↑
e1

“mixed with 170 g l−1 NPK triple 17 fertilizer resulted in the best plant development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–913 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Dispersant was not required to improve sugarcane height and stem development.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
No dispersant or adherent was required to improve plant height and stem developmente1

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane plant development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–526 · show in text ↑
e1

“No dispersant or adherent was required to improve plant height and stem development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–998 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.