Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilization did not influence juice quality.

A claim from Biomass yield, nutritional status and industrial quality of sugarcane as a function of nitrogen and potassium fertilization · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not influence juice quality.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
fertilizationt0
Outcome
quality of the juicee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“did not influence the quality of the juice, which had average concentrations of 22.23; 19.63; 88.30 and 16.50 (Brix, Pol, Purity and PC, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1134
t0

“sugarcane as a function of nitrogen and potassium fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–123

Title

Biomass yield, nutritional status and industrial quality of sugarcane as a function of nitrogen and potassium fertilization

Mauro Wagner de Oliveira; Christiano Nascif; Programa de Desenvolvimento da Pecuária Leiteira da Região de Viçosa- MG (PDPL-RV), Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2018. doi:10.21475/ajcs.18.12.05.pne1082

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-9b641de9e855682a28833c7e58a798ba899715bb25376be4658df6896459c808 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 20 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Manure treatments improved juice quality over RDF alone.

    EFFECT OF ORGANIC MANURES ON SOIL FERTILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGARCANE IN NORTH COASTAL ZONE OF ANDHRA PRADESH · 2011 · compared with RDF alone

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    NPKS fertilization significantly increased sugarcane yield and quality characters compared with NK, especially under NPKS.

    Long-term fertilization has different impacts on bacterial communities and phosphorus forms in sugarcane rhizosphere and bulk soils under low-P stress · 2022 · compared with NK

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Reduced inorganic fertilizer with FYM or press mud, and extra ratoon N, gave better yield and juice quality.

    Effects of Integrated Nutrient Management on Plant Crop and Successive First and Second Ratoon Crops of Sugarcane in Bangladesh · 2007

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Distributing N, P and K in two separate operations gave better operational quality than simultaneous fertilizer and herbicide application in sugarcane.

    MECHANIZED AND INDIVIDUALIZED APPLICATION OF N-P-K IN COMBINED OPERATIONS IN SUGARCANE · 2017 · compared with simultaneous operation of fertilizer distribution and herbicide application treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    The interaction of double sett with NPK level 281-140-275 kg ha -1 (25%>recommended) gave the highest crop performance

    Impact of NPK Fertilization on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) under Different Planting Methods · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Half the conventional nitrogen dose through fertigation improved sugarcane quality.

    Effects of N Application Rate on Growth of Sugarcane under Drip Fertigation · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Product quality improved under the fertilizer treatments.

    Technique of high efficient utilization of phosphoric fertilizer and its application in Leizhou Peninsula · 2004

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Full recommended nitrogen (100% N) gave the significantly highest sugarcane yield and quality among all treatments.

    Effect of consortium of endophytic Nitrogen fixing bacteria on yield and quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane second Ratoon · 2018 · compared with all the treatments

    Opposite direction

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.