Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The first sowing date had higher stem, ear and total plant nitrogen percentage.

A claim from Effect of Different Rates of Nitrogen and Irrigation on Dry Matter and Nitrogen Content of Corn at Different Growth Stages During Two Sowing Dates · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The first sowing date had higher stem, ear and total plant nitrogen percentage.

Treatment
first sowing datee1
Outcome
plant nitro- gen percentage (stem, ear and total)e0
Direction
highere1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant nitro- gen percentage (stem, ear and total)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1097
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95
e1

“The first sowing date outcome had a significantly higher leaf area index and dry weight (ear, tassel and total)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1046

Title

Effect of Different Rates of Nitrogen and Irrigation on Dry Matter and Nitrogen Content of Corn at Different Growth Stages During Two Sowing Dates

MOHAMED KIWAN; SAMIR AL-SOLAIMANI Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Meteorology Environment and Arid Land Agriculture Sciences 2003. doi:10.4197/met.14-1.2

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-9c025f1fbf968f040847bc1a7c3fb3c0f1998d7d4946e792631b57b9027fb266 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.