Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biofertilizer with ferrous sulphate gave maximum polar diameter of 13.75 cm.

A claim from Effect of biofertilizers and micronutrients on growth and quality attributes of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer with ferrous sulphate gave maximum polar diameter of 13.75 cm.

Treatment
Biofertilizers + Ferrous sulphate 0.5%e0
Outcome
polar diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13.75 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly maximum polar diameter (13.75 cm) and maximum equatorial diameter (13.36 cm) was recorded in treatment combination B1M3 (Biofertilizers + Ferrous sulphate 0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1193
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–124

Title

Effect of biofertilizers and micronutrients on growth and quality attributes of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.)

Shivani Rana; Kuldeep Singh Thakur; Ramesh Kumar Bhardwaj; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i1x.8501

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9c5f75d03021c823daca9ad639f3385a56aea49b61187a50122904e7ab0e0c18 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

sulfate · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.