Paper · 2024 · Journal of Animal Environmental Science

Effects of filtered liquid fertilizer and compost tea derived from livestock waste on growth of plants, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory for Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.)

Linh Le Tran Yen; Su-Yeon Shim; Junkuyng Lee; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The livestock industry plays a vital role in the economy by producing food for humans. However, the unsuitable livestock management can have detrimental effects on the environment. The methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) produced from livestock waste led to the greenhouse effect. Thus, the livestock waste recycling is necessary to produce crops in sustainable agriculture. This study aims to assess the effects of organic liquid fertilizers derived from livestock waste on broccoli growth, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory properties. The fertilizer treatment groups were chemical fertilizer (CF), chlorella cultured in filtered liquid fertilizer is liquid bio fertilizer (LBF), and compost tea mixed with filtered liquid fertilizer (CT+LF). The plant height, leaf length, leaf width, and SPAD values did not exhibit any significant differences in broccoli until 50 days when supplied with chemical fertilizer (CF), liquid biofertilizer (LBF), or compost tea + liquid fertilizer (CT+LF). However, the values of plant length and SPAD units on day 71 were higher in the CF group than in the LBF and CT+LF groups. Furthermore, several antioxidant activities were increased in the LBF group for DPPH or CT+LF group for nitrite scavenging, indicating that organic fertilizers can enhance antioxidant levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 50, plant height, leaf length and leaf width did not differ significantly among the three fertilizer groups.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer (CF), liquid biofertilizer (LBF), or compost tea + liquid fertilizer (CT+LF)e0
Outcome
plant height, leaf length, leaf widthe0
Direction
did not exhibit any significant differencese0
Qualifier
until 50 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, leaf length, leaf width, and SPAD values did not exhibit any significant differences in broccoli until 50 days when supplied with chemical fertilizer (CF), liquid biofertilizer (LBF), or compost tea + liquid fertilizer (CT+LF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD values did not differ significantly among fertilizer groups through day 50.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer (CF), liquid biofertilizer (LBF), or compost tea + liquid fertilizer (CT+LF)e0
Outcome
SPAD valuese0
Direction
did not exhibit any significant differencese0
Qualifier
until 50 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, leaf length, leaf width, and SPAD values did not exhibit any significant differences in broccoli until 50 days when supplied with chemical fertilizer (CF), liquid biofertilizer (LBF), or compost tea + liquid fertilizer (CT+LF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On day 71 plant length was higher with CF than with LBF and CT+LF.

Treatment
CF groupe0
Outcome
plant lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
day 71e0
Comparator
LBF and CT+LF groupse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the values of plant length and SPAD units on day 71 were higher in the CF group than in the LBF and CT+LF groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On day 71 SPAD units were higher with CF than with LBF and CT+LF.

Treatment
CF groupe0
Outcome
SPAD unitse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
day 71e0
Comparator
LBF and CT+LF groupse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the values of plant length and SPAD units on day 71 were higher in the CF group than in the LBF and CT+LF groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LBF increased DPPH antioxidant activity.

Treatment
LBF groupe0
Outcome
DPPHe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“several antioxidant activities were increased in the LBF group for DPPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT+LF increased nitrite scavenging activity.

Treatment
CT+LF groupe0
Outcome
nitrite scavenginge0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“CT+LF group for nitrite scavenging, indicating that organic fertilizers can enhance antioxidant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1308 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.