Paper · 2022 · Horticulturae

Combined Use of Spent Mushroom Substrate Biochar and PGPR Improves Growth, Yield, and Biochemical Response of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis): A Preliminary Study on Greenhouse Cultivation

Ivan Širić; Ebrahem M. Eid; Mostafa A. Taher; et al.

19
claims
50
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This paper investigated the impact of the combined use of spent mushroom substrate (SMS) biochar and plant-growth-promoting rhizobia (PGPR) on the growth, yield, and biochemical response of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). A preliminary study was conducted under greenhouse condition using six treatments (sextuplicate) as control (no addition), T1 (PGPR), T2 (5 g/Kg biochar), T3 (5 g/Kg biochar + PGPR), T4 (10 g/Kg biochar), and T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR) under greenhouse conditions. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM-Zeiss), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), and Fourier’s transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses showed that biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of SMS had advantageous structural, functional, and morphological properties for agricultural use. Results showed that SMS biochar addition aids the acceleration of soil nutrient properties. SMS biochar and PGPR application also significantly (p < 0.05) improved the selected growth, yield, and biochemical parameters of cauliflower. In particular, the highest cauliflower yield (550.11 ± 10.05 g), fresh plant biomass (1.66 ± 0.04 Kg), dry plant biomass (149.40 ± 4.18 g), plant height (22.09 ± 0.14 cm), root length (11.20 ± 0.05 cm), plant spread (28.35 ± 0.18 cm), and the number of leaves (12.50 ± 0.50) were observed in T5 treatment. Similarly, the best values for biochemical parameters and enzyme activities such as total chlorophyll (TC: 3.13 ± 0.07 mg/g), superoxide dismutase (SOD: 79.12 ± 1.29 µg/g), catalase (CAT: 55.70 ± 2.52 µg/g), peroxidase (POD 30.18 ± 0.37 µg/g), total phenolics (TP: 19.50 ± 0.31 mg/g), ascorbic acid (AA: 14.18 ± 0.55 mg/g), and total carotenoids (TCT: 150.17 ± 8.20 µg/100 g) were also recorded in the T5 treatment. The application of SMS biochar and PGPR showed a positive correlation with growth, yield, and biochemical response of cauliflower, as indicated by the Pearson correlation analysis. The findings of this study suggest efficient recycling of mushroom industry waste for biochar production and the use of PGPR to improve nutrient utilization in sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spent mushroom biochar had properties considered advantageous for agriculture.

Outcome
advantageous structural, functional, and morphological properties for agricultural usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of SMS had advantageous structural, functional, and morphological properties for agricultural use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS biochar increased soil nutrient properties.

Treatment
SMS biochar additione0
Outcome
soil nutrient propertiese0
Direction
acceleratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SMS biochar addition aids the acceleration of soil nutrient properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biochar and PGPR significantly improved cauliflower growth, yield, and biochemical parameters.

Treatment
SMS biochar and PGPR applicatione0
Outcome
growth, yield, and biochemical parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SMS biochar and PGPR application also significantly (p < 0.05) improved the selected growth, yield, and biochemical parameters of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest cauliflower yield, 550.11 ± 10.05 g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
cauliflower yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
550.11 ± 10.05 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest cauliflower yield (550.11 ± 10.05 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest fresh biomass, 1.66 ± 0.04 Kg.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
fresh plant biomasse0
Value
1.66 ± 0.04 Kge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh plant biomass (1.66 ± 0.04 Kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest dry biomass, 149.40 ± 4.18 g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
dry plant biomasse0
Value
149.40 ± 4.18 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry plant biomass (149.40 ± 4.18 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest plant height, 22.09 ± 0.14 cm.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
22.09 ± 0.14 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (22.09 ± 0.14 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest root length, 11.20 ± 0.05 cm.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Value
11.20 ± 0.05 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (11.20 ± 0.05 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest plant spread, 28.35 ± 0.18 cm.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
plant spreade0
Value
28.35 ± 0.18 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant spread (28.35 ± 0.18 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest leaf count, 12.50 ± 0.50.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
12.50 ± 0.50e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves (12.50 ± 0.50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the best total chlorophyll value, 3.13 ± 0.07 mg/g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Value
3.13 ± 0.07 mg/ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll (TC: 3.13 ± 0.07 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1462 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the best superoxide dismutase value, 79.12 ± 1.29 µg/g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
superoxide dismutasee0
Value
79.12 ± 1.29 µg/ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (SOD: 79.12 ± 1.29 µg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1509 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the best catalase value, 55.70 ± 2.52 µg/g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
catalasee0
Value
55.70 ± 2.52 µg/ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catalase (CAT: 55.70 ± 2.52 µg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the best peroxidase value, 30.18 ± 0.37 µg/g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
peroxidasee0
Value
30.18 ± 0.37 µg/ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase (POD 30.18 ± 0.37 µg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1580 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the best total phenolics value, 19.50 ± 0.31 mg/g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
total phenolicse0
Value
19.50 ± 0.31 mg/ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolics (TP: 19.50 ± 0.31 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1621 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the best ascorbic acid value, 14.18 ± 0.55 mg/g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Value
14.18 ± 0.55 mg/ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid (AA: 14.18 ± 0.55 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the best total carotenoids value, 150.17 ± 8.20 µg/100 g.

Treatment
T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)e1
Outcome
total carotenoidse0
Value
150.17 ± 8.20 µg/100 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total carotenoids (TCT: 150.17 ± 8.20 µg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1713 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (10 g/Kg biochar + PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS biochar and PGPR application correlated positively with cauliflower growth, yield, and biochemical response.

Treatment
SMS biochar and PGPRe0
Outcome
growth, yield, and biochemical responsee0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SMS biochar and PGPR showed a positive correlation with growth, yield, and biochemical response of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1883 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using mushroom waste biochar and PGPR to improve nutrient use in sustainable agriculture.

Outcome
use of PGPR to improve nutrient utilization in sustainable agriculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficient recycling of mushroom industry waste for biochar production and the use of PGPR to improve nutrient utilization in sustainable agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑

biochar · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

growing medium · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 62 positive, 4 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

biochar · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.