Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bone biofertilizer produced greater wheat residue weight.

A claim from Phosphorus Biofertilizers from Ash and Bones—Agronomic Evaluation of Functional Properties · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone biofertilizer produced greater wheat residue weight.

Treatment
Biofertilizer from bonese0
Outcome
weight of wheat crop residuese0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer from bones resulted in a greater weight of wheat crop residues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1307

Title

Phosphorus Biofertilizers from Ash and Bones—Agronomic Evaluation of Functional Properties

Magdalena Jastrzebska; Marta K. Kostrzewska; Kinga Treder; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2016. doi:10.5539/jas.v8n6p58

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-9c83f79bb54d0d5f54dfb0dbd619448e19687057c941628bfeb1f84776c39e78 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Mycorrhizal fungi strongly reduced wheat nitrogen recovery from organic matter.

    The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on total plant nitrogen uptake and nitrogen recovery from soil organic material · 2013 · compared with uninoculated control

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Biofertilizers showed no residual effect on wheat.

    Residual effect of farmyard manure, fertilizer and biofertilizer on succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Inoculation increased Fusarium-damaged kernels in all three years.

    Comparison of the influence of inoculum sources on the development of fusarium head blight and the deoxynivalenol content in spring wheat in a disease nursery · 2006 · compared with noninoculated control

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Bacteria alone failed to produce bacterial disease of wheat.

    A note on the relation of nematodes (Tylenchus tritici) to the development of the bacterial disease of wheat caused by Bacterium tritici · 1946

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wheat plants did not become infected after mechanical inoculation with suspensions infectious to leafhoppers.

    SOME PROPERTIES OF WHEAT STRIATE MOSAIC VIRUS · 1963

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Ethanol application did not increase wheat kernel weights.

    Effect of Foliar Ethanol Application on Septoria Leaf Blotch in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivitm L.) · 1997

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Sap from mosaic annual bluegrass infected wheat.

    Soil-Borne Wheat Mosaic Virus from Poa annua L., a New Host · 1968

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Seed inoculation with H. diazotrophicus E19 did not affect Cercozoa communities of winter wheat

    Plant developmental stage, rather than inoculation with Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus, determines the composition of the bacterial, fungal, and protist microbiome in winter wheat · 2025

    Opposite direction

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.