Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Post-anthesis irrigation cut-off significantly reduced wheat number of grains per spike by 27.1%.

A claim from Evaluation of Yield, Yield Components and Stress Tolerance Indices in Bread Wheat Cultivars at Post-anthesis Irrigation Cut-Off · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis irrigation cut-off significantly reduced wheat number of grains per spike by 27.1%.

Treatment
irrigation cut-offe0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
27.1%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that irrigation cut-off caused a significant reduction in biological yield (46.4%), grain yield (59%), harvest index (23.7%), number of grains per spike (27.1%) and 1000 grain weight (13.8%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–843
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–81

Title

Evaluation of Yield, Yield Components and Stress Tolerance Indices in Bread Wheat Cultivars at Post-anthesis Irrigation Cut-Off

Ghasem Halim; Yahya Emam; Ehsan Shakeri Journal of Crop production and processing 2018. doi:10.29252/jcpp.7.4.121

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-9c92e2784058cc25215dcc0bd2b35459ce445999de55b91cf7cf946b3fcde3fb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.