Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping not affected cassava tuber yield.

A claim from Productivity of cassava/okra intercropping systems as influenced by okra planting density · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping not affected cassava tuber yield.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced the total number of tubers but the tuber yield was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1083
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–23

Title

Productivity of cassava/okra intercropping systems as influenced by okra planting density

CO Muoneke; E. U. Mbah African Journal of Agricultural Research 2007. doi:10.5897/ajar.9000568

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-9cabf74e2c3c41fb511172d8f16ef631b08949c3a1d397052e47b8d1c56fac2f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.