Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lentil intercropping had no significant effect on sugarcane yield.

A claim from Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Autumn Planted Sugarcane under Different Planting Patterns with Lentil Intercropping · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil intercropping had no significant effect on sugarcane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Lentil intercroppinge0
Interactor
LentilLens culinarise0other
Outcome
sugarcane yielde0
Direction
did not have any significant effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · InteractorUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lentil intercropping did not have any significant effect on sugarcane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–836

Title

Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Autumn Planted Sugarcane under Different Planting Patterns with Lentil Intercropping

Mubashar Nadeem; Asif Tanveer; Hardev Sandhu; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10050644

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-9d6a4db89979cd1bfb7e13767e389446b66c1d1585ef44bc5be03d68e68707dc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Lens culinaris · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.