Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lentil and pea intercrops gave moderate sugarcane yields.

A claim from Evaluating intercropping systems with sugarcane in Bihars’ north-west alluvial plains · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil and pea intercrops gave moderate sugarcane yields.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
leguminous intercrops such as lentil and peae1
Outcome
yieldse1
Qualifier
moderatee1
Setting
Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran, Bihare5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorDirectionValue

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane intercropped with potato recorded the highest cane yield (1027 q/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.59), cane equivalent yield (1717 q/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.47), followed by lentil and pea intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1576
e1

“Additionally, the inclusion of leguminous intercrops such as lentil and pea resulted in moderate yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1021
e5

“The experiment was chalked out in randomized block design at the Krishi Vigyan Kendra located in Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran, Bihar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–603

Title

Evaluating intercropping systems with sugarcane in Bihars’ north-west alluvial plains

P Abhik; P S Rajendra; P D Aditya; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.10590

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e3550faa2976446f88a0f794af4f071b494f4d68d9dea64c81b3c1eb1b693ebd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Lens culinaris · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.