Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At DM 27.15%, 106cfu/g lactic acid bacteria and 15g/kg glucose improved silage quality and integrated evaluation relative to the other treatments.

A claim from Effect of adding lactic acid bacteria and glucose on alfalfa silage quality · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At DM 27.15%, 106cfu/g lactic acid bacteria and 15g/kg glucose improved silage quality and integrated evaluation relative to the other treatments.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
106cfu/g lactic acid bacteria and 15g/kg glucosee0
Interactor
lactic acid bacteriae0other
Outcome
silage quality and integrated evaluatione0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
DM 27.15%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The silage quality and integrated evaluation of alfalfa(DM 27.15%) with 106cfu/g lactic acid bacteria and 15g/kg glucose is better than those of alfalfa with the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–726

Title

Effect of adding lactic acid bacteria and glucose on alfalfa silage quality

Li Wan Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao 2007

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9da0b3161e0be0b50deaf1eca9b1ea6b5425646ef71faf04ea37bf8779e686c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

glucose · quality: general · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.