Claim · model-written summary
Orchard yields varied widely independently of planting-hole treatment.
- Taxon
- Apples
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- wide range in yieldse0
- Qualifier
- independent of planting-hole treatmente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“orchards, which were characterized by a wide range in yields, independent of planting-hole treatment.”
t0“Apples”
Title
Planting-hole Amendments Modify Growth and Fruiting of Apples on Replant Sites
G.H. Neilsen; J. Beulah; E.J. Hogue; et al. HortScience 1994. doi:10.21273/hortsci.29.2.82
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect MAP combinations increased first-year apple shoot growth.
- Intervention effect MAP combinations increased second-year blossoms in most orchards.
- Intervention effect MAP combinations increased first-year trunk area increment in half the orchards.
- Intervention effect Treatments generally did not affect apple trunk area increment by year three.
- Intervention effect Treatments increased third-season blossoms in two of seven orchards that blossomed in the second season.
- Intervention effect Three-year cumulative yield increased significantly in only three orchards.
- Observation MAP plus peat recovered treatment cost in only one orchard.
- Mechanism Inadequate K or Cu nutrition may have reduced apple growth in some orchards.