Intervention effectmodel-written summary

MAP combinations increased first-year apple shoot growth.

A claim from Planting-hole Amendments Modify Growth and Fruiting of Apples on Replant Sites · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP combinations increased first-year apple shoot growth.

Treatment
monoammonium phosphate (MAP) fertilizer+ peat, MAP+ mancozeb, or MAP + peat + a bacterial antagoniste0
Outcome
First-year shoot growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First-year shoot growth, the number of blossoms in the second year (inmost orchards), and first-year trunk cross-sectional area increment (TCAI) in 50% of test orchards were increased by monoammonium phosphate (MAP) fertilizer+ peat, MAP+ mancozeb, or MAP + peat + a bacterial antagonist.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–532
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61

Title

Planting-hole Amendments Modify Growth and Fruiting of Apples on Replant Sites

G.H. Neilsen; J. Beulah; E.J. Hogue; et al. HortScience 1994. doi:10.21273/hortsci.29.2.82

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-330db282be78a72e2b7c2aa0846c3e0d473a4b074f354bcdb385e9fd292e8f67 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mancozeb · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.