Abstract
The results of Pseudomonas spp.’s effect on Podosphoera leucotricha (Ell. et Ev.) (Salm.) in commercial plantings of apple trees of Renet Simirenko variety are presented in the article. It reveals that use of the bio-fungicide in three consistent treatments during fruit ripening period at the rate of 4.0 l/ha reduces the disease’ spread and development intensity, ensuring biological efficacy of 94.4-99.6%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Three consecutive biofungicide treatments at 4.0 l/ha during fruit ripening reduce disease spread and development intensity in Renet Simirenko apple plantings.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae1 - Material
- Renet Simirenkoe1
- Treatment
- bio-fungicide in three consistent treatments during fruit ripening period at the rate of 4.0 l/hae0
- Interactor
- Podosphoera leucotrichae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas spp.
Pseudomonase1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- disease’ spread and development intensitye0
- Direction
- reducese0
- Setting
- commercial plantingse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“use of the bio-fungicide in three consistent treatments during fruit ripening period at the rate of 4.0 l/ha reduces the disease’ spread and development intensity”
e1“Pseudomonas spp.’s effect on Podosphoera leucotricha (Ell. et Ev.) (Salm.) in commercial plantings of apple trees of Renet Simirenko variety”
Claim · model-written summary
The biofungicide treatment achieves biological efficacy of 94.4-99.6%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Renet Simirenkoe1
- Treatment
- bio-fungicide in three consistent treatments during fruit ripening period at the rate of 4.0 l/hae0
- Interactor
- Podosphoera leucotrichae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas spp.Pseudomonase1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- biological efficacye0
- Value
- 94.4-99.6%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“use of the bio-fungicide in three consistent treatments during fruit ripening period at the rate of 4.0 l/ha reduces the disease’ spread and development intensity, ensuring biological efficacy of 94.4-99.6%”
e1“Pseudomonas spp.’s effect on Podosphoera leucotricha (Ell. et Ev.) (Salm.) in commercial plantings of apple trees of Renet Simirenko variety”
The same questions in other papers
biocontrol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →stage · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
stage · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
biocontrol · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.