Paper · 2010 · Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research

Flower and fruit thinning effects on the development and quality of 'Sampion' apple fruits

Iwona Szot

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of flower or fruit hand-thinning methods on fruit quality was estimated in the experiment conducted from 1997 to 1999, at the commercial orchard near Lublin in Poland. The experiment was carried out on 'Sampion' trees/M.26 planted in a bed system at 1 x 2 x 4 m spacing. The study was a complete randomized block design with a single-tree plot replicated eight times. In 1999, during the vegetative period, the dynamics of fruitlet growth were also observed. Fruitlets on trees subjected to flower thinning towards the end of the flowering period, were characterized as having a fast rate of growth in all separated subperiods. However, the control fruits, despite having quite a fast rate of growth in the first separated subperiod, showed the slowest rate of growth in the following two subperiods. Flower thinning at the pink bud stage, and towards the end of flowering had a beneficial influence on yield of fruit > 70 mm in diameter and mean fruit mass. The control trees gave the smallest yield of fruit > 70 mm in diameter. The control fruits were characterized as having a lower mean fruit mass. Fruits from trees subjected to flower thinning at the pink bud stage had the biggest P and K content, but tended to have the smallest Ca content and the biggest K/Ca ratio. The control fruits had the great Ca content and tended to have the lowest K/Ca ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning near the end of flowering produced fast fruitlet growth in all separated subperiods.

Organ / stage
Fruitletse0
Treatment
flower thinning towards the end of the flowering periode0
Outcome
fast rate of growthe0
Direction
faste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruitlets on trees subjected to flower thinning towards the end of the flowering period, were characterized as having a fast rate of growth in all separated subperiods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruitlets had the slowest growth in the two later subperiods.

Material
'Sampion't0
Outcome
rate of growthe0
Direction
sloweste0
Qualifier
following two subperiodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control fruits, despite having quite a fast rate of growth in the first separated subperiod, showed the slowest rate of growth in the following two subperiods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pink bud stage flower thinning improved yield of fruit over 70 mm.

Treatment
Flower thinning at the pink bud stagee0
Outcome
yield of fruit > 70 mm in diametere0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning at the pink bud stage, and towards the end of flowering had a beneficial influence on yield of fruit > 70 mm in diameter and mean fruit mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning near the end of flowering improved yield of fruit over 70 mm.

Treatment
towards the end of floweringe0
Outcome
yield of fruit > 70 mm in diametere0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning at the pink bud stage, and towards the end of flowering had a beneficial influence on yield of fruit > 70 mm in diameter and mean fruit mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pink bud stage flower thinning improved mean fruit mass.

Treatment
Flower thinning at the pink bud stagee0
Outcome
mean fruit masse0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning at the pink bud stage, and towards the end of flowering had a beneficial influence on yield of fruit > 70 mm in diameter and mean fruit mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning near the end of flowering improved mean fruit mass.

Treatment
towards the end of floweringe0
Outcome
mean fruit masse0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning at the pink bud stage, and towards the end of flowering had a beneficial influence on yield of fruit > 70 mm in diameter and mean fruit mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control trees gave the smallest yield of fruit over 70 mm.

Outcome
yield of fruit > 70 mm in diametere0
Direction
smalleste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control trees gave the smallest yield of fruit > 70 mm in diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit had lower mean fruit mass.

Outcome
mean fruit masse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control fruits were characterized as having a lower mean fruit mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from pink bud thinning had the greatest P content.

Treatment
flower thinning at the pink bud stagee0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
biggeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits from trees subjected to flower thinning at the pink bud stage had the biggest P and K content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from pink bud thinning had the greatest K content.

Treatment
flower thinning at the pink bud stagee0
Outcome
K contente0
Direction
biggeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits from trees subjected to flower thinning at the pink bud stage had the biggest P and K content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from pink bud thinning tended toward the smallest Ca content.

Treatment
flower thinning at the pink bud stagee1
Outcome
Ca contente0
Direction
smalleste0
Qualifier
tendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tended to have the smallest Ca content and the biggest K/Ca ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1290 · show in text ↑
e1

“flower thinning at the pink bud stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from pink bud thinning had the greatest K/Ca ratio.

Treatment
flower thinning at the pink bud stagee1
Outcome
K/Ca ratioe0
Direction
biggeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tended to have the smallest Ca content and the biggest K/Ca ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1290 · show in text ↑
e1

“flower thinning at the pink bud stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit had great Ca content.

Outcome
Ca contente0
Direction
greate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control fruits had the great Ca content and tended to have the lowest K/Ca ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit tended toward the lowest K/Ca ratio.

Outcome
K/Ca ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
tendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control fruits had the great Ca content and tended to have the lowest K/Ca ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Sampion' apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

pruning · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 58 positive, 48 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

stage · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.