Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rainwater harvesting gave the highest grain yield precipitation use efficiency at Morago.

A claim from In-Field Rainwater Harvesting Tillage in Semi-Arid Ecosystems: I Maize–Bean Intercrop Performance and Productivity · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainwater harvesting gave the highest grain yield precipitation use efficiency at Morago.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IRWH tillage systemse0
Outcome
PUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Morago sitese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest values of PUE under IRWH tillage systems for the Morago sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1787
t0

“Maize–Bean Intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85

Title

In-Field Rainwater Harvesting Tillage in Semi-Arid Ecosystems: I Maize–Bean Intercrop Performance and Productivity

Weldemichael Tesfuhuney; Muthianzhele Ravuluma; Admire Rukudzo Dzvene; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12173027

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9df6d04cd1a4ac2e14621803ade4a85119b14e1a0e0379bdea42e9d0be48c5b4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

rainfall · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.