Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen recovery did not significantly differ with liming or cultivar.

A claim from Improved Root Growth by Liming Aluminum-Sensitive Rice Cultivar or Cultivating an Aluminum-Tolerant One Does Not Enhance Fertilizer Nitrogen Recovery Efficiency in an Acid Paddy Soil · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen recovery did not significantly differ with liming or cultivar.

Treatment
limede0
Outcome
fertilizer N recovery efficiencye0
Direction
did not differ significantlye0
Comparator
non-limed conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizer N recovery efficiency and N loss did not differ significantly between limed and non-limed conditions, or between the two rice cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1133
e1

“Al-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–199

Title

Improved Root Growth by Liming Aluminum-Sensitive Rice Cultivar or Cultivating an Aluminum-Tolerant One Does Not Enhance Fertilizer Nitrogen Recovery Efficiency in an Acid Paddy Soil

Hao Qing Zhang; Xue Qiang Zhao; Yi Ling Chen; et al. Plants 2020. doi:10.3390/plants9060765

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9edf00f2a8bcc47ed731dca08478734090849302541d226289e5dce945367d0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

lime · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.