Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Microdosing increased topsoil lateral root length density by 72% at 25 cm from the hill center relative to broadcast NPK.

A claim from DETERMINANTS OF FERTILIZER MICRODOSING-INDUCED YIELD INCREMENT OF PEARL MILLET ON AN ACID SANDY SOIL · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microdosing increased topsoil lateral root length density by 72% at 25 cm from the hill center relative to broadcast NPK.

Taxon
PEARL MILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
fertilizer microdosinge0
Outcome
lateral root length densitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
72%e0
Qualifier
25 cme0
Comparator
broadcast of 200-kg NPK ha −1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer microdosing enhanced the lateral root length density in the topsoil (0–20 cm) by 72% and 40% at respective lateral distances of 25 cm and 50 cm from the centre of the hill compared with broadcast of 200-kg NPK ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1418
t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78

Title

DETERMINANTS OF FERTILIZER MICRODOSING-INDUCED YIELD INCREMENT OF PEARL MILLET ON AN ACID SANDY SOIL

ALI IBRAHIM; ROBERT CLEMENT ABAIDOO; DOUGBEDJI FATONDJI; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2015. doi:10.1017/s0014479715000241

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-9ee30f5fa66ae23234c7ed4247951ffef927de7946236639ae2f2d5da746ebec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 68 positive, 2 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.