Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The yield benefit of nitrification inhibitors was greater (13.5%) with manure at 168 kg N/ha than at 224 kg N/ha.

A claim from Use of Nitrification Inhibitors with Summer Applications of Swine Manure · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield benefit of nitrification inhibitors was greater (13.5%) with manure at 168 kg N/ha than at 224 kg N/ha.

Treatment
nitrification inhibitorse1
Outcome
corn yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
13.5%e1
Qualifier
manure was applied at the 168 kg N/ha (150 lb N/ac) ratee1
Comparator
224 kg N/ha (200 lb N/ac) ratee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The beneficial effects of nitrification inhibitors on corn yields were greater (13.5%) when manure was applied at the 168 kg N/ha (150 lb N/ac) rate as compared to the 224 kg N/ha (200 lb N/ac) rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1016

Title

Use of Nitrification Inhibitors with Summer Applications of Swine Manure

A. L. Sutton; D. M. Huber; D. D. Jones; et al. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1990. doi:10.13031/2013.26385

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9f3733e4ff8949aff21e552b31494d0ef1d2bcb98b66b743fc3e82e95467a20d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrification inhibitor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.