Paper · 1990 · Applied Engineering in Agriculture

Use of Nitrification Inhibitors with Summer Applications of Swine Manure

A. L. Sutton; D. M. Huber; D. D. Jones; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A two-year study was conducted to determine the effects of inhibiting nitrification on the fertilizer value of swine manure applied in the summer season. Nitrapyrin (0.56, 1.12, 1.68 kg/ha; 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 lbs/ac) or etradiazol (1.2 kg/ha; 1.0 lb/ac) was added to swine manure from a finishing house. All manures were injected at the rate of 22 450 to 35 078 L/ha (2400 to 3750 gal/ac) into an Odell silt loam soil following wheat (Triticum aestivum) harvested in early July. Total nitrogen application rates on the manure plots ranged from 168 to 224 kg N/ha (150 to 200 lbs N/ac) based on the corn plant requirement of 207 kg N/ha (185 lb N/ac) with a 9415 kg/ha (150 bu/ac) grain yield. At above optimal nitrogen application levels, average corn yields were increased 5% by the addition of a nitrification inhibitor. The beneficial effects of nitrification inhibitors on corn yields were greater (13.5%) when manure was applied at the 168 kg N/ha (150 lb N/ac) rate as compared to the 224 kg N/ha (200 lb N/ac) rate. Response to the higher rate of nitrogen indicated excess N was applied than needed for grain production, which compensated partially for N loss. Over the entire study, adding 1.12 kg/ha (1.0 lb/ac) of nitrapyrin to manure increased corn yields the most compared to other inhibitor levels or etradiazol. Soil nutrient levels did not increase from the manure applications. There was a lower incidence of stalk rot when nitrification was inhibited.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At above-optimal nitrogen levels, adding a nitrification inhibitor increased average corn yields by 5%.

Treatment
addition of a nitrification inhibitore0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5%e0
Qualifier
At above optimal nitrogen application levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At above optimal nitrogen application levels, average corn yields were increased 5% by the addition of a nitrification inhibitor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield benefit of nitrification inhibitors was greater (13.5%) with manure at 168 kg N/ha than at 224 kg N/ha.

Treatment
nitrification inhibitorse1
Outcome
corn yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
13.5%e1
Qualifier
manure was applied at the 168 kg N/ha (150 lb N/ac) ratee1
Comparator
224 kg N/ha (200 lb N/ac) ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The beneficial effects of nitrification inhibitors on corn yields were greater (13.5%) when manure was applied at the 168 kg N/ha (150 lb N/ac) rate as compared to the 224 kg N/ha (200 lb N/ac) rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over the whole study, adding 1.12 kg/ha of nitrapyrin to manure increased corn yields the most compared with other inhibitor levels or etradiazol.

Treatment
adding 1.12 kg/ha (1.0 lb/ac) of nitrapyrin to manuree2
Outcome
corn yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
other inhibitor levels or etradiazole2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“adding 1.12 kg/ha (1.0 lb/ac) of nitrapyrin to manure increased corn yields the most compared to other inhibitor levels or etradiazol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrient levels did not increase from the manure applications.

Treatment
manure applicationse3
Outcome
Soil nutrient levelse3
Direction
did not increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Soil nutrient levels did not increase from the manure applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1387 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was a lower incidence of stalk rot in corn when nitrification was inhibited.

Treatment
nitrification was inhibitede4
Outcome
incidence of stalk rote4
Direction
lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“There was a lower incidence of stalk rot when nitrification was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1462 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–603 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The response to the higher nitrogen rate indicated that more N was applied than needed for grain production, partially compensating for N loss.

Treatment
higher rate of nitrogene6
Outcome
excess N was applied than needed for grain productione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Response to the higher rate of nitrogen indicated excess N was applied than needed for grain production, which compensated partially for N loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1161 · show in text ↑
e5

“corn plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–603 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nitrification inhibitor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.