Paper · 1979 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Growth and Tissue Composition of Sweet Corn as Affected by Nitrogen Source, Nitrapyrin, and Season1

B. D. Rudert; S. J. Locascio

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Sweet corn ( Zea mays L.) was grown to evaluate the effect of N source, N rate, time of N application, and the nitrification inhibitor, 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine (nitrapyrin), on crop efficiency and movement of applied N on a Kanapaha fine sand. Sweet corn yield was not affected by nitrapyrin rates of 0, 0.56, and 1.12 kg/ha, during 2 seasons. During a wet 1976 summer season, total yield was 65% higher with N applied as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 than as Ca(NO 3 ) 2 . Total yield increased linearly from 6. 1 to 9.8 MT/ha with an increase in N rate from 56 to 224 kg/ha as (NH 4 )SO 4 . With Ca(NO 3 ) 2 , total yield averaged 4.9 MT/ha and was not influenced by N rate. During the drier 1977 spring season, marketable yield was not influenced by N source. Total yield increased linearly from 9.1 to 14.6 MT/ha with an increase in N rate. In the wetter season, the application of N in split rather than single applications as Ca(NO 3 ) 2 increased yield. During the dry season, timing of N application had no effect on yield with either N source. The suppressing action of NH 4 -N absorption on the absorption of other cations was evident but was not consistent throughout the study. The application of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 as compared to Ca(NO 3 ) 2 resulted in higher plant dry weights at an early sampling stage in the wet season but not during the dry season. Higher soil N (NH 4 -N + NO 3 -N) levels were maintained above a 20-cm soil depth with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 than with Ca(NO 3 ) 2 during the wet season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin rates did not significantly affect sweet corn yield over two seasons.

Taxon
Sweet corne0
Treatment
nitrapyrin rates of 0, 0.56, and 1.12 kg/hae0
Outcome
Sweet corn yielde0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
during 2 seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn yield was not affected by nitrapyrin rates of 0, 0.56, and 1.12 kg/ha, during 2 seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate raised total yield 65% relative to calcium nitrate in the wet 1976 summer.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
N applied as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
65%e0
Qualifier
wet 1976 summer seasone0
Comparator
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“During a wet 1976 summer season, total yield was 65% higher with N applied as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 than as Ca(NO 3 ) 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield increased linearly from 6.1 to 9.8 MT/ha as ammonium sulfate nitrogen rate rose from 56 to 224 kg/ha.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
N rate from 56 to 224 kg/ha as (NH 4 )SO 4e0
Outcome
Total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6. 1 to 9.8 MT/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield increased linearly from 6. 1 to 9.8 MT/ha with an increase in N rate from 56 to 224 kg/ha as (NH 4 )SO 4 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With calcium nitrate, total yield averaged 4.9 MT/ha and did not vary with nitrogen rate.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
not influencede0
Value
4.9 MT/hae0
Qualifier
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With Ca(NO 3 ) 2 , total yield averaged 4.9 MT/ha and was not influenced by N rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source did not affect marketable yield in the drier 1977 spring.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
N sourcee0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
not influencede0
Qualifier
drier 1977 spring seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“During the drier 1977 spring season, marketable yield was not influenced by N source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the dry season, total yield rose linearly from 9.1 to 14.6 MT/ha as nitrogen rate increased.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
Total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.1 to 14.6 MT/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield increased linearly from 9.1 to 14.6 MT/ha with an increase in N rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split calcium nitrate applications increased yield relative to one application in the wetter season.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
N in splite0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
wetter seasone0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Verbatim

e0

“In the wetter season, the application of N in split rather than single applications as Ca(NO 3 ) 2 increased yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application timing did not affect yield with either source in the dry season.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
timing of N applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
either N sourcee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“During the dry season, timing of N application had no effect on yield with either N source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrogen absorption suppressed other cation absorption inconsistently across the study.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Compound
NH 4 -Ne0
Outcome
absorption of other cationse0
Direction
suppressinge0
Qualifier
not consistent throughout the studye0

Verbatim

e0

“The suppressing action of NH 4 -N absorption on the absorption of other cations was evident but was not consistent throughout the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate increased early plant dry weight relative to calcium nitrate in the wet season.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4e0
Outcome
plant dry weightse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
early sampling stage in the wet seasone0
Comparator
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 as compared to Ca(NO 3 ) 2 resulted in higher plant dry weights at an early sampling stage in the wet season but not during the dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate did not increase early plant dry weight relative to calcium nitrate in the dry season.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4e0
Outcome
plant dry weightse0
Direction
not during the dry seasone0
Comparator
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 as compared to Ca(NO 3 ) 2 resulted in higher plant dry weights at an early sampling stage in the wet season but not during the dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate maintained higher soil nitrogen above 20 cm depth than calcium nitrate in the wet season.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4e0
Outcome
soil N (NH 4 -N + NO 3 -N) levelse0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
above a 20-cm soil depthe0
Comparator
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher soil N (NH 4 -N + NO 3 -N) levels were maintained above a 20-cm soil depth with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 than with Ca(NO 3 ) 2 during the wet season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.