Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Overall yield-scaled N2O–N emissions were 22% lower with nitrapyrin than without the inhibitor

A claim from Nitrous oxide emissions in Midwest US maize production vary widely with band-injected N fertilizer rates, timing and nitrapyrin presence · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall yield-scaled N2O–N emissions were 22% lower with nitrapyrin than without the inhibitor

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
nitrapyrine6
Outcome
Overall yield-scaled N2O–N emissionse6
Direction
lowere6
Value
22%e6
Comparator
without the inhibitore6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54
e6

“Overall yield-scaled N2O–N emissions were 22% lower with nitrapyrin than without the inhibitor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1615

Title

Nitrous oxide emissions in Midwest US maize production vary widely with band-injected N fertilizer rates, timing and nitrapyrin presence

Juan P Burzaco; Doug R Smith; Tony J Vyn Environmental Research Letters 2013. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035031

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-29c081861222e2c8fac4de5d4d04d210c35c55575b4745fa42164cbbf5cb599b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.