Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Assessing Management of Nitrapyrin with Urea Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer on Corn Yield and Soil Nitrogen in a Poorly-Drained Claypan Soil

H. Habibullah; Kelly A. Nelson; Peter P. Motavalli

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Use of nitrification inhibitors (NI) in agricultural production systems is considered a risk management strategy for both agricultural and environmental considerations. It can be utilized when risk of reduced nitrogen (N) fertilizer use efficiency or yield, and risk of pollution from mineral N is high which can occur in poorly-drained soils that are vulnerable to waterlogging and runoff. Field research was conducted on corn (Zea mays L.) from 2012 to 2015 in Missouri, USA on a poorly-drained claypan soil. Treatments consisted of two application timings of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) fertilizer solution [pre-emergence (PRE) and V3 growth stage], two application rates (143 and 168 kg N ha-1) in the presence or absence of nitrapyrin, and a non-treated control. UAN at 143 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrin at the V3 growth stage resulted in the highest yield (8.6 Mg ha-1). Similarly, pre-emergence application of UAN 168 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrin resulted in greater yields (7.7 Mg ha-1). UAN application rates and timings affected soil NO3-N and NH4-N concentrations more than the presence or absence of nitrapyrin during the growing season. A side-dress application of a lower rate of UAN with nitrapyrin at V3 was effective in poorly-drained soils when risk of N losses during the growing season due to unfavorable precipitation events and other environmental variables was high. A pre-emergence application of UAN with nitrapyrin was also effective and it may eliminate the need for split-application of N fertilizer later in the season thereby reducing the workload on growers during the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN at 143 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrin at V3 produced the highest corn yield, 8.6 Mg ha-1.

Treatment
UAN at 143 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrin at the V3 growth stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.6 Mg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UAN at 143 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrin at the V3 growth stage resulted in the highest yield (8.6 Mg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence UAN at 168 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrin gave greater corn yield of 7.7 Mg ha-1.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of UAN 168 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrine0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
7.7 Mg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-emergence application of UAN 168 kg ha-1 with nitrapyrin resulted in greater yields (7.7 Mg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN application rate and timing affected soil NO3-N and NH4-N concentrations more than nitrapyrin presence.

Treatment
UAN application rates and timingse0
Outcome
soil NO3-N and NH4-N concentrationse0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
presence or absence of nitrapyrine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UAN application rates and timings affected soil NO3-N and NH4-N concentrations more than the presence or absence of nitrapyrin during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Side-dressed lower-rate UAN with nitrapyrin at V3 was effective in poorly drained soils when nitrogen-loss risk was high.

Outcome
side-dress application of a lower rate of UAN with nitrapyrin at V3 was effectivee0
Qualifier
poorly-drained soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A side-dress application of a lower rate of UAN with nitrapyrin at V3 was effective in poorly-drained soils when risk of N losses during the growing season due to unfavorable precipitation events and other environmental variables was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence UAN with nitrapyrin was effective and may eliminate later split application.

Outcome
pre-emergence application of UAN with nitrapyrin was also effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pre-emergence application of UAN with nitrapyrin was also effective and it may eliminate the need for split-application of N fertilizer later in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

stage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 41 positive, 57 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.