Mechanismmodel-written summary

The smaller growth decline of C5 and Zafar 1 under drought is attributed to better antioxidant enzyme activities and to accumulation of proline and total chlorophyll.

A claim from Response of Different Genotypes of Faba Bean Plant to Drought Stress · 2015

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The smaller growth decline of C5 and Zafar 1 under drought is attributed to better antioxidant enzyme activities and to accumulation of proline and total chlorophyll.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
drought stresse5
Compound
Proe5
Outcome
deteriorating effect of drought stress on the growth performancee5
Qualifier
better antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT, POD and SOD)e5

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“10 Vicia faba genotypes (Zafar 1, Zafar 2, Shebam, Makamora, Espan, Giza Blanka, Giza 3, C4, C5 and G853)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–413
e5

“the deteriorating effect of drought stress on the growth performance of genotypes "C5" and "Zafar 1" were relatively low due to its better antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT, POD and SOD), and accumulation of Pro and Total Chl, and leaf RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1301

Title

Response of Different Genotypes of Faba Bean Plant to Drought Stress

Manzer Siddiqui; Mutahhar Al-Khaishany; Mohammed Al-Qutami; et al. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2015. doi:10.3390/ijms160510214

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-9f604c855e368e2eb17f09e450a06717b0be17e7a13aa692bd4c578f0642ea07 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer