Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Response of Different Genotypes of Faba Bean Plant to Drought Stress

Manzer Siddiqui; Mutahhar Al-Khaishany; Mohammed Al-Qutami; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
203
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major abiotic stresses that are a threat to crop production worldwide. Drought stress impairs the plants growth and yield. Therefore, the aim of the present experiment was to select the tolerant genotype/s on the basis of moprpho-physiological and biochemical characteristics of 10 Vicia faba genotypes (Zafar 1, Zafar 2, Shebam, Makamora, Espan, Giza Blanka, Giza 3, C4, C5 and G853) under drought stress. We studied the effect of different levels of drought stress i.e., (i) normal irrigation (ii) mild stress (iii) moderate stress, and (iv) severe stress on plant height (PH) plant-1, fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) plant-1, area leaf-1, leaf relative water content (RWC), proline (Pro) content, total chlorophyll (Total Chl) content, electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, and activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) of genotypes of faba bean. Drought stress reduced all growth parameters and Total Chl content of all genotypes. However, the deteriorating effect of drought stress on the growth performance of genotypes "C5" and "Zafar 1" were relatively low due to its better antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT, POD and SOD), and accumulation of Pro and Total Chl, and leaf RWC. In the study, genotype "C5" and "Zafar 1" were found to be relatively tolerant to drought stress and genotypes "G853" and "C4" were sensitive to drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced growth parameters and total chlorophyll content of all faba bean genotypes compared with normal irrigation.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
Drought stresse2
Outcome
growth parameters and Total Chl contente2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
normal irrigatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“10 Vicia faba genotypes (Zafar 1, Zafar 2, Shebam, Makamora, Espan, Giza Blanka, Giza 3, C4, C5 and G853)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought stress reduced all growth parameters and Total Chl content of all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1049 · show in text ↑
e3

“(i) normal irrigation (ii) mild stress (iii) moderate stress, and (iv) severe stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–586 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes C5 and Zafar 1 were relatively tolerant to drought stress.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Material
"C5" and "Zafar 1"e4
Outcome
relatively tolerant to drought stresse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“10 Vicia faba genotypes (Zafar 1, Zafar 2, Shebam, Makamora, Espan, Giza Blanka, Giza 3, C4, C5 and G853)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–413 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the study, genotype "C5" and "Zafar 1" were found to be relatively tolerant to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1399 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes G853 and C4 were sensitive to drought stress.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Material
"G853" and "C4"e6
Outcome
sensitive to drought stresse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“10 Vicia faba genotypes (Zafar 1, Zafar 2, Shebam, Makamora, Espan, Giza Blanka, Giza 3, C4, C5 and G853)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–413 · show in text ↑
e6

“and genotypes "G853" and "C4" were sensitive to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1462 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The smaller growth decline of C5 and Zafar 1 under drought is attributed to better antioxidant enzyme activities and to accumulation of proline and total chlorophyll.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
drought stresse5
Compound
Proe5
Outcome
deteriorating effect of drought stress on the growth performancee5
Qualifier
better antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT, POD and SOD)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“10 Vicia faba genotypes (Zafar 1, Zafar 2, Shebam, Makamora, Espan, Giza Blanka, Giza 3, C4, C5 and G853)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–413 · show in text ↑
e5

“the deteriorating effect of drought stress on the growth performance of genotypes "C5" and "Zafar 1" were relatively low due to its better antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT, POD and SOD), and accumulation of Pro and Total Chl, and leaf RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1301 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.