Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pearlmillet–mustard cropping yielded 25.29 qlha mustard equivalent in 1998–99 and ranked first.

A claim from Performance of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in sequential cropping systems under irrigated conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearlmillet–mustard cropping yielded 25.29 qlha mustard equivalent in 1998–99 and ranked first.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. emend. Stuntzl Indian mustard cropping systeme0
Outcome
lndian mustard equivalent yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
25.29 qlhae1
Qualifier
1998 99e0
Comparator
all other cropping systemse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. emend. Stuntzl Indian mustard cropping system proved significantly superior to all other cropping systems, , giving 20.7 and 25.29 qlha lndian mustard equivalent yield during 1997 98 and as 1998 99, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–557
e1

“25.29 qlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–481
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–29

Title

Performance of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in sequential cropping systems under irrigated conditions

B.S. SINSINWAR; FATEH SlNGH; O.P. PREMl Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v47i2.3139

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a020fa2e572ea8a181ed6c3f728dc318b8185ef3d213f425f4c46cf9ad827c64 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.