Intervention effectmodel-written summary

MAS nanoparticles had antifungal potential similar to tolclofos-methyl.

A claim from Antifungal activity of fabricated mesoporous alumina nanoparticles against root rot disease of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporium · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAS nanoparticles had antifungal potential similar to tolclofos-methyl.

Treatment
MAS nanoparticlese0
Outcome
antifungal potentiale0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
tolclofos-methyle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MAS nanoparticles presented an antifungal potential similar to that of tolclofos-methyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–771
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101

Title

Antifungal activity of fabricated mesoporous alumina nanoparticles against root rot disease of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporium

Mohamed Shenashen; Aly Derbalah; Amany Hamza; et al. Pest Management Science 2016. doi:10.1002/ps.4420

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-a12ebfdd5930c0a20ecebc3adcd3d8e6e04ce4c0451b7220a49d9c20255aa5d5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    CuO nanoparticle treatment reduced cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin and other monosaccharides in root cell walls.

    Hydrogen sulphide regulates the growth of tomato root cells by affecting cell wall biosynthesis under CuO NPs stress · 2021

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Nanoparticle exposure lowered wax crystallization patterns in tomato exocarp.

    La2O3 Nanoparticles Can Cause Cracking of Tomato Fruit through Genetic Reconstruction · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Nano-NPK alone decreased the concentration of other tomato phytochemicals.

    Enhancing tomato phytochemicals and fruit quality through nano-NPK and salicylic acid chemigation · 2025

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Cu content increased in tomato tissues under salinity with Cu nanoparticles.

    Responses of Tomato Plants under Saline Stress to Foliar Application of Copper Nanoparticles · 2019

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Nano-vermicompost ameliorated the decline in nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorous content.

    Improving growth and photosynthetic performance of drought stressed tomato by application of nano-organic fertilizer involves up-regulation of nitrogen, antioxidant and osmolyte metabolism · 2021

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Selenium nanoparticles improved the content of beneficial biocompounds in tomato fruits.

    Se Nanoparticles Induce Changes in the Growth, Antioxidant Responses, and Fruit Quality of Tomato Developed under NaCl Stress · 2019

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The 0.6% nano-ZnO film maintained cherry tomato soluble solid content over 15 days.

    Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan–Nano-ZnO Composite Films for Preservation of Cherry Tomatoes · 2021

    Same direction

  8. positive
    20 mg/L nano-Fe3o4 reduced cadmium accumulation in tomato.

    Response of tomato plants to interaction effects of magnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticles and cadmium stress · 2019

    Same direction

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.