Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Imazethapyr 200 g/ha plus surfactant reduced dominant weed density, at par with 100 and 125 g/ha.

A claim from Weed management in groundnut with imazethapyr + surfactant · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr 200 g/ha plus surfactant reduced dominant weed density, at par with 100 and 125 g/ha.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
imazethapyr 200 g/ha + surfactante0
Interactor
dominant weedse0weed
Outcome
density of dominant weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
lower rates of 100 and 125 g/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of imazethapyr 200 g/ha + surfactant being at par with its lower rates of 100 and 125 g/ha, reduced the density of dominant weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–317
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28

Title

Weed management in groundnut with imazethapyr + surfactant

Rajesh Kumar Singh; Shivam Kumar Verma; Rai Singh Indian Journal of Weed Science 2014

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a1a7b4e110969cb3010267ab1233908e269cbdbf169faeccaa736a0d74852ed1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Imazethapyr · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.