Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil addition of 40 kg sulphur/ha through gypsum with the recommended chemical fertilizer dose gave higher benefit-cost ratio (BCR) value in sunflower.

A claim from Evaluation of Different Sulphur Sources on Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil addition of 40 kg sulphur/ha through gypsum with the recommended chemical fertilizer dose gave higher benefit-cost ratio (BCR) value in sunflower.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuuse3
Treatment
40 kg sulphur/ ha through gypsum (266kg/ha) in soil addition with recommended dose of chemical fertilizere1
Outcome
BCR valuee1
Direction
highere1
Setting
Amrelie2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the treatment T 8 40 kg sulphur/ ha through gypsum (266kg/ha) in soil addition with recommended dose of chemical fertilizer get higher oil content and higher yield of sunflower with higher BCR value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–758
e2

“A field trial was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Amreli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–323
e3

“Sunflower is an important edible oilseed crop of the country”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60

Title

Evaluation of Different Sulphur Sources on Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.)

G. S Vala; J. J Vaghani; V. N Gohil IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 2014. doi:10.9790/2380-071135962

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-a1bdef4caef88e2ad909c5a7c7857f082ab94df70458ba5e72984a3427fc2bfd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

45 papers: 43 positive, 2 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

lime · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

356 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.