Claim · model-written summary
Chemical thinning generally increased return bloom.
- Taxon
- Apple Trees
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Chemical thinninge0
- Outcome
- return bloome0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Chemical thinning generally increased return bloom”
t0“Apple Trees”
Title
Effect of Chemical Thinners on ‘Delicious’ Apple Trees Previously Sprayed with GA4+7 + BA
Duane W. Greene; William J. Lord HortScience 1985. doi:10.21273/hortsci.20.1.84
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Prior GA4+7 plus BA did not increase fruit thinning by carbaryl or NAA.
- Intervention effect Chemical thinning did not increase fruit size.
- Intervention effect GA4+7 plus BA increased fruit length-to-diameter ratio.
- Intervention effect GA4+7 plus BA did not affect fruit size or seed number.
- Intervention effect Chemical thinners did not alter the GA4+7 plus BA responses.
- Intervention effect Responses were similar after one or two consecutive years of treatment.
- Intervention effect Treatment responses were similar across Delicious strains and tree ages.