Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chemical thinning generally increased return bloom.

A claim from Effect of Chemical Thinners on ‘Delicious’ Apple Trees Previously Sprayed with GA4+7 + BA · 1985

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical thinning generally increased return bloom.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Chemical thinninge0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical thinning generally increased return bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–281
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54

Title

Effect of Chemical Thinners on ‘Delicious’ Apple Trees Previously Sprayed with GA4+7 + BA

Duane W. Greene; William J. Lord HortScience 1985. doi:10.21273/hortsci.20.1.84

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a245df77313cd8aafbe0a364905fdd0b61964ed9434e5e384c6f421d5051dc3e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

138 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.