Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Half early-podding defoliation reduced groundnut grain yield by 43.3%.

A claim from Effects of defoliation on growth and yield in groundnut (Arachis hypogea), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata), soyabean (Glycine max) and green gram (Vigna aurens) · 1975

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half early-podding defoliation reduced groundnut grain yield by 43.3%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
half defoliatede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
43.3e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest reduction in grain yield occurred when the plants were defoliated during the early podding stage, the percentage reduction being 59.7, 79.0, 86.4 and 95.3 in groundnut, cowpeas, soyabeans and green gram respectively when completely defoliated at this stage and 43.3, 14.0, 42.4 and 46.1 respectively when only half defoliated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–708
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogea), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata), soyabean (Glycine max) and green gram (Vigna aurens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–156

Title

Effects of defoliation on growth and yield in groundnut (Arachis hypogea), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata), soyabean (Glycine max) and green gram (Vigna aurens)

B. A. C. ENYI Annals of Applied Biology 1975. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1975.tb01522.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-a267e50c86ea4e09a81f710c74961fc9a09297d94a766b016cda28c93a3c3b5d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

19 papers: 7 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.