Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize was significantly increased with urea containing different urease inhibitor concentrations compared with normal urea.

A claim from Effects of Urease Inhibitor on Summer Maize Yield and N Use Efficiency · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize was significantly increased with urea containing different urease inhibitor concentrations compared with normal urea.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
urea with different urease inhibitor concentratione0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal Ureae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43
e0

“Compared to the normal Urea,the nitrogen use efficiency and after harvest soil Nmin for urea with different urease inhibitor concentration were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–518

Title

Effects of Urease Inhibitor on Summer Maize Yield and N Use Efficiency

Han Bao-wen Yumi kexue 2011

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-a281da0ba44bb99e2cdb79d88dab6ef39c0a63707549711ae11476fdf37fb6dc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

EC 3.5.1.5 (urease) inhibitor · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 194 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.