Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The chemical regimes increased maize K uptake 20.6 to 20.8% versus unweeded check.

A claim from Influence of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Weed Dynamics, Productivity and Nutrient Uptake of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chemical regimes increased maize K uptake 20.6 to 20.8% versus unweeded check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.6 to 20.8%e0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher N, P and K uptake by maize, 22.7 to 24, 37.2 to 38.6 and 20.6 to 20.8%, respectively compared with unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1036

Title

Influence of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Weed Dynamics, Productivity and Nutrient Uptake of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.)

Birendra Kumar Shambhu Prasad; Devendra Mandal Rakesh Kumar International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.175

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-a352940efefd43a006764b82ee1c5a880c5f63fa40834034e370a368a2f5c7f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer