Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip fertigation significantly improved subsoil moisture in Brassica napus compared with conventional surface irrigation.

A claim from Toward sustainable Brassica napus production: Optimizing fertilization regimes for yield, water, and nutrient efficiency · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation significantly improved subsoil moisture in Brassica napus compared with conventional surface irrigation.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
drip fertigatione0
Outcome
subsoil moisturee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
conventional surface irrigatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33
e0

“drip fertigation significantly improved subsoil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1076
e1

“conventional surface irrigation with a single top-dressing of compound fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–726

Title

Toward sustainable Brassica napus production: Optimizing fertilization regimes for yield, water, and nutrient efficiency

Qiang Zheng; Peng Song; Xin Wang; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2026. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110145

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-a39cd1f7fda4aedad71312bdce01fe968ae5d7be281f5b8d2cad9d88672040f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · soil: physics · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.