Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silicon fertilizer increased tomato yield by 5.45% compared with Stanley fertilizer.

A claim from Effects of Silicon Fertilizer on Yield,Quality and Fertilizer Utilization Rate of Tomato · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer increased tomato yield by 5.45% compared with Stanley fertilizer.

Treatment
silicon fertilizer(N-P2O5-K2 O 20-10-20)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5. 45%e0
Comparator
‘Stanley'fertilizere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88
e0

“Applying silicon fertilizer(N-P2O5-K2 O 20-10-20)could increase the yield by 16. 16% compared with the control,and increased by 5. 45% compared with the group of applying‘Stanley'fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–568

Title

Effects of Silicon Fertilizer on Yield,Quality and Fertilizer Utilization Rate of Tomato

Tang Ai-ju Anhui nongye kexue 2015

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a423aab3c331a0f990725261210b703d11c83f9e38bd0d7df3d61b8793d5f5fa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

37 papers: 35 positive, 2 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this claim · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

969 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.