Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Stage II salinity hastened flowering in H 82-2.

A claim from Flowering and male reproductive functions of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes as affected by salinity · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stage II salinity hastened flowering in H 82-2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
H 82-2e0
Treatment
salinity treatment given at stage IIe0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
hastenede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In H 82-2 and C-235 salinity treatment given at stage II (when few flower buds appeared) hastened the flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–645
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74

Title

Flowering and male reproductive functions of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes as affected by salinity

H. R. Dhingra; T. M. Varghese Biologia Plantarum 1993. doi:10.1007/bf02928525

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-a506328a2d3fc2d81f14099e091a44bfb3759b3d44d9ea9818500d2e4415aea4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

salinity · phenology · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.