Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seeds initially imbibed 8, 12, or 16 h and desiccated germinated faster than controls.

A claim from Desiccation of imbibed and germinating pea axes causes a partial reversal of germination events · 1985

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds initially imbibed 8, 12, or 16 h and desiccated germinated faster than controls.

Treatment
desiccated to their original moisture contente0
Outcome
completed germinatione0
Direction
shorter timee0
Qualifier
8, 12, and 16 he0
Comparator
control (once-imbibed) seedse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds initially imbibed for 8, 12, and 16 h and desiccated to their original moisture content completed germination in a shorter time than control (once-imbibed) seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–696
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–42

Title

Desiccation of imbibed and germinating pea axes causes a partial reversal of germination events

Louise Lalonde; J. Derek Bewley Canadian Journal of Botany 1985. doi:10.1139/b85-319

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a522b48bb316a2ea6f7f99dfab2cf4b681b4365f7eb26add7a0825646f26e2c2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

soil water · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.