Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Straw return combined with subsoiling increased maize yield by 38.2% compared with rotary tillage without straw.

A claim from Subsoiling with straw return promotes soil nitrogen supply and increase maize yield in saline‐alkaline farmland of the Yellow River Delta · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return combined with subsoiling increased maize yield by 38.2% compared with rotary tillage without straw.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
straw return combined with subsoilinge3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasese3
Value
38.2%e3
Comparator
rotary without strawe3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“soil salinity, nitrogen transformation and maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–579
e3

“straw return combined with subsoiling achieved the highest plant nitrogen uptake and yield, with increases of 21.7% and 38.2%, respectively, compared to the rotary without straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1584

Title

Subsoiling with straw return promotes soil nitrogen supply and increase maize yield in saline‐alkaline farmland of the Yellow River Delta

Chunxiao Yu; Hanwen Liu; Shide Dong; et al. Soil Use and Management 2024. doi:10.1111/sum.13165

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-a5fb5b89c42446f20f0921bb2be6fe1e1c29578b6b7307c60fa146328ca7fba4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

364 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.