Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined treatment raised soybean yield by 24%.

A claim from Innovative aspects of stimulating the growth and development of grain and leguminous crops in Western Siberia · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised soybean yield by 24%.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phasee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was established in the variants with seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phase. The increase was 21% for spring wheat, 23% for barley and 24% for soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1073

Title

Innovative aspects of stimulating the growth and development of grain and leguminous crops in Western Siberia

Rinat R. Galeev; Dmitry D. Petrov; Maxim A. Albert; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2023. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202339001019

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a67067f37d59eea248d79f06a078d9e2c7ebe1a3f1a8794865d63449321ce48b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 137 positive, 31 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    GA3 seed treatment reduced soybean leaf area and dry matter yield.

    Gibberellin and cytokinin effects on soybean growth · 2003

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    FeEDDHA seed treatment did not increase seed yield compared with the control.

    A Comparison of Three Methods for Reducing Iron‐Deficiency Chlorosis in Soybean · 2000 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Seed treatments did not consistently produce significant yield differences across cultivars where heavy rain occurred later.

    Integrated Management Strategies for Phytophthora sojae Combining Host Resistance and Seed Treatments · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    No significant difference in plant stand or yield was observed between neonicotinoid-treated and untreated soybeans.

    Impacts of neonicotinoid seed treatments on soil-dwelling pest populations and agronomic parameters in corn and soybean in Quebec (Canada) · 2020 · compared with untreated

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nematicide seed treatment had no effect on soybean yield.

    Corn and Soybean Yield Response to Tillage, Rotation, and Nematicide Seed Treatment · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Seed treatments did not affect plant density, pod density, or seed yield.

    Planting Date and Seed Treatment Effects on Soybean in the Northeastern United States · 2008

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Early seed treatment of soybean does not affect yield.

    Phytotoxicity in soybean seeds treated with phytosanitary products at different application times · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Fungicide seed treatment did not improve soybean yields.

    Soybean Emergence from Field Seedbed Environments · 1981

    Opposite direction

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soybean yields were similar under conventional and no tillage.

    Cover crop, tillage, and herbicide effects on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield · 2003 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    The seedbed tillage method and herbicide treatments did not significantly affect soybean yields in 1976.

    Seedbed Tillage and Herbicide Influence on Soybean (Glycine max) Weed Control and Yield · 1979

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Average no-till yields of soybean were similar to conventional tillage yields.

    Corn/Soybean Rotation Effect as Influenced by Tillage, Nitrogen, and Hybrid/Cultivar · 1991 · compared with CT

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Twenty-year mean soybean yield was reduced by 4 to 7% under chisel, ridge and no-till systems in both rotation and monoculture compared with plowing.

    Effect of Tillage and Rotation on Agronomic Performance of Corn and Soybean: Twenty‐Year Study on Dark Silty Clay Loam Soil · 1996 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage systems did not significantly affect soybean yield in rotation.

    Tillage for Continuous Corn and Corn-Soybean Rotation · 1982

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soybean yield was not affected by tillage systems under weed-free conditions.

    Influence of Tillage Systems on Annual Weed Densities and Control in Solid-seeded Soybean (Glycine max) · 1990

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    No-till yielded 1.1 t ha−1, lower than reduced tillage.

    Weed Control Using Conventional Tillage, Reduced Tillage, No-Tillage, and Cover Crops in Organic Soybean · 2017 · compared with RT

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    No tillage had reduced grain yields, indicating lower carbon inputs.

    Carbon and Nitrogen Storage are Greater under Biennial Tillage in a Minnesota Corn–Soybean Rotation · 2006

    Opposite direction

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.