Paper · 2023 · E3S Web of Conferences

Innovative aspects of stimulating the growth and development of grain and leguminous crops in Western Siberia

Rinat R. Galeev; Dmitry D. Petrov; Maxim A. Albert; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The results of three-year studies (2020-2022) on the effectiveness of pre-sowing seed treatment of grain crops (spring soft wheat, spring barley and oats) and legumes (soybeans) in terms of stimulating growth and development, increasing productivity and product quality are presented. The experiments were carried out on leached chernozem and gray forest soil of the Novosibirsk and Orda districts of the Novosibirsk region. In the experiments, we used the variety of spring soft wheat Likamero, spring barley Paustian, oats - Max and soybeans - SibNIIK 9. The largest leaf area parameters were noted in spring wheat against the background of presowing seed treatment with Lignohumate 80 g/t, followed by spraying in the tillering phase with Energia M 20 g/ha. The applied growth regulators significantly increased the yield of grain crops and soybeans. The highest yield was established in the variants with seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phase. The increase was 21% for spring wheat, 23% for barley and 24% for soybeans. The preparations used improved the yield structure of all crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat had its largest leaf area after Lignohumate seed treatment followed by Energia M spray.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
presowing seed treatment with Lignohumate 80 g/t, followed by spraying in the tillering phase with Energia M 20 g/hae0
Outcome
leaf area parameterse0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest leaf area parameters were noted in spring wheat against the background of presowing seed treatment with Lignohumate 80 g/t, followed by spraying in the tillering phase with Energia M 20 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators significantly increased grain-crop yield.

Taxon
grain cropse0
Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The applied growth regulators significantly increased the yield of grain crops and soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators significantly increased soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied growth regulators significantly increased the yield of grain crops and soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised spring wheat yield by 21%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phasee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was established in the variants with seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phase. The increase was 21% for spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised barley yield by 23%.

Treatment
seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phasee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was established in the variants with seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phase. The increase was 21% for spring wheat, 23% for barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised soybean yield by 24%.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phasee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was established in the variants with seed treatment with Lingvohumate followed by the use of Energia M in the tillering phase. The increase was 21% for spring wheat, 23% for barley and 24% for soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The applied preparations improved yield structure across all studied crops.

Taxon
all cropse0
Treatment
preparations usede0
Outcome
yield structuree0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The preparations used improved the yield structure of all crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain crops (spring soft wheat, spring barley and oats) and legumes (soybeans)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–177 · show in text ↑

class · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 137 positive, 31 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.