Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Urea and ammonium nitrate improved lettuce N, P, and K content relative to ammonium sulphate.

A claim from EFFECT OF SOME NITROGEN SOURCES AND POTASSIUM LEVELS ON YIELD, QUALITY AND NITRATE ACCUMULATION IN LETTUCE LEAVES · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea and ammonium nitrate improved lettuce N, P, and K content relative to ammonium sulphate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
urea and ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
N, P and K contente0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
no considerable differences among them in most casese0
Comparator
ammonium sulphatee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both urea and ammonium nitrate were significantly improved N, P and K content of lettuce plant relative to ammonium sulphate with no considerable differences among them in most cases in the two seasons of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1751

Title

EFFECT OF SOME NITROGEN SOURCES AND POTASSIUM LEVELS ON YIELD, QUALITY AND NITRATE ACCUMULATION IN LETTUCE LEAVES

M. Abou El-Nasr, Journal of Plant Production 2002. doi:10.21608/jpp.2002.254724

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-a78a7579eaaa6ecbafa843b34fb7a677fecac2b78cbdbe778e53b247e9de8b5a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

ammonium nitrate · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 35 positive, 17 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.