Claim · model-written summary
ZTZT had the minimum input energy requirement in the maize–wheat system.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the minimum was recorded with ZTZT sequential tillage system”
t0“maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Title
R.L. CHOUDHARY; U.K. BEHERA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v58i1.4163
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Zero tillage saved 20% input energy in maize relative to conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage saved 15% input energy in wheat relative to conventional tillage.
- Observation CTCT had the maximum input energy requirement in the maize–wheat system.
- Intervention effect Sequential tillage did not significantly alter gross and net output energy production.
- Intervention effect ZTZT had significantly maximum energy-use efficiency, exceeding CTCT by 29.76%.
- Intervention effect ZTZT energy-use efficiency exceeded CTZT by 19.44%.
- Intervention effect ZTZT energy-use efficiency exceeded ZTCT by 11.49%.
- Intervention effect Wheat zero-tillage sequences increased irrigation water-use efficiency by 46% relative to conventional-tillage wheat sequences.
- Intervention effect Increasing N from 0 to 120 kg N/ha significantly increased input and output energy and IWUE.
- Intervention effect Increasing N from 0 to 180 kg N/ha significantly decreased energy-use efficiency and NUE.
- Recommendation The authors recommend zero tillage with 120 kg N/ha to enhance resource-use efficiency.