Claim · model-written summary
ZTZT energy-use efficiency exceeded CTZT by 19.44%.
- Taxon
- maizewheate0
- Treatment
- ZTZT sequencee0
- Outcome
- energy-use efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 19.44e0
- Comparator
- CTZTe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Significantly maximum energy-use efficiency in maizewheat cropping system was recorded with ZTZT sequence, which was 29.76, 19.44 and 11.49 % higher than the CTCT, CTZT and ZTCT sequential tillage practices, respectively during the year 2010-11”
Title
R.L. CHOUDHARY; U.K. BEHERA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v58i1.4163
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Zero tillage saved 20% input energy in maize relative to conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage saved 15% input energy in wheat relative to conventional tillage.
- Observation CTCT had the maximum input energy requirement in the maize–wheat system.
- Observation ZTZT had the minimum input energy requirement in the maize–wheat system.
- Intervention effect Sequential tillage did not significantly alter gross and net output energy production.
- Intervention effect ZTZT had significantly maximum energy-use efficiency, exceeding CTCT by 29.76%.
- Intervention effect ZTZT energy-use efficiency exceeded ZTCT by 11.49%.
- Intervention effect Wheat zero-tillage sequences increased irrigation water-use efficiency by 46% relative to conventional-tillage wheat sequences.
- Intervention effect Increasing N from 0 to 120 kg N/ha significantly increased input and output energy and IWUE.
- Intervention effect Increasing N from 0 to 180 kg N/ha significantly decreased energy-use efficiency and NUE.
- Recommendation The authors recommend zero tillage with 120 kg N/ha to enhance resource-use efficiency.