Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Naphthaleneacetic acid did not improve rooting of St. George, 1613, and AXR #1 cuttings.

A claim from Factors Affecting the Rooting of Grape Cuttings II. Growth Regulators · 1961

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Naphthaleneacetic acid did not improve rooting of St. George, 1613, and AXR #1 cuttings.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
St. George, 1613, and AXR #1e0
Treatment
naphthaleneacetic acide0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Indolebutyric acid, naphthaleneacetic acid, and gibberellic acid did not improve the rooting of cuttings of St. George, 1613, and AXR #1 rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147
t0

“Grape Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–47

Title

Factors Affecting the Rooting of Grape Cuttings II. Growth Regulators

C. J. Alley American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 1961. doi:10.5344/ajev.1961.12.4.185

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a80ec50dea4e7b3fe88ea270ee97913ddc829f06b8b1d68c01ca2040ccd09602 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · VitisResults differ

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.