Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate at 1800 g a.e ha-1 significantly lowered weed density and weed dry weight.

A claim from Evaluation of Weed Control Options for Herbicide Resistant Transgenic Stacked (TC 1507 X NK603) and Conventional Maize Hybrids for Higher Productivity · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 1800 g a.e ha-1 significantly lowered weed density and weed dry weight.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
early post emergence application of glyphosate at 1800 g a.e ha-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density, weed dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early post emergence application of glyphosate at 1800 g a.e ha-1 gave significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight and higher weed control efficiency at all the intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1401
t0

“Maize Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–126

Title

Evaluation of Weed Control Options for Herbicide Resistant Transgenic Stacked (TC 1507 X NK603) and Conventional Maize Hybrids for Higher Productivity

Sivagamy Kannan; Chinnusamy Chinnagounder American Journal of Plant Sciences 2013. doi:10.4236/ajps.2013.49209

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-a85f1fcedfc2561d1456a180db6861224bd0ac3ffd17183a667840670d51d32e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.